New Zealand’s government is introducing controversial new powers to address homelessness and disruptive behaviour in city centres, sparking a nationwide debate. Prime Minister Chris Luxon argues the changes will ensure visitors, like cruise tourists “Chuck and Mary,” experience Auckland at its best, free from intimidation. He believes police need these tools to tackle issues like rough sleeping, begging, and threatening behaviour that currently don’t always trigger an offence.
The proposed amendments to the Summary Offences Act would allow police to issue “move-on” orders to anyone aged 14 or older found begging, sleeping rough, or acting in a disorderly, disruptive, threatening, or intimidating manner. Breaching such an order could lead to a fine of up to $2000 or three months in jail. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith insists this policy is not about criminalising poverty, but about reclaiming city streets that have been “blighted by disruption” and where people no longer feel safe.
However, these measures have drawn strong criticism. The Salvation Army is “deeply concerned,” arguing the powers risk disproportionately affecting vulnerable individuals and merely move problems out of sight without addressing the core issues of poverty, housing insecurity, and mental health challenges. They fear it could “criminalise vulnerability.” Opposition parties, including the Greens and Labour, accuse the government of “ignoring evidence” (police data shows public disorder offences are at a 10-year low) and “punching down” on those who need help most, rather than investing in support services and affordable housing.
This new law highlights a growing tension between the desire for safer, more welcoming city spaces and the need to compassionately support the most vulnerable in our communities.
